Title: | Pasadena Heritage takes on the NFL |
Subtitle: | |
Date: | 2003-03-02 |
Summary: | March 2 -- Pasadena Heritage opposes the initial renovation plans for the Rose Bowl that are part of the aging stadium's bid to win an NFL team. |
Author: | Gary Scott |
Publication: | Pasadena Star News |
Content: | Rose Bowl renovation not exactly an end run PASADENA -- As the city ponders inviting the NFL into its hallowed but aging Rose Bowl, preservationists say they oppose initial renovation plans and want a more open discussion about how professional football might affect the community. In a letter sent to the Rose Bowl Operating Co. on Jan. 30, Pasadena Heritage officials said the future of the stadium, the Arroyo Seco and Pasadena itself are at a ``major crossroads.\'\' They ask for ``full disclosure\'\' of the preliminary architectural and financial plans being devel oped to entice the NFL to the stadium, and recommend the RBOC or City Council hold a public forum to discuss the issues. Pasadena Heritage\'s advocacy committee was given the chance to review conceptual design plans to make the 81-year- old stadium accommodate professional football. The plans have been shared with the mayor and at least one other council member, but have not been made public. ``It seems clear that the Rose Bowl would not survive in any visible or recognizable way were an NFL project to proceed,\'\' writes Susan Mossman, Pasadena Heritage\'s executive director, and Jim Crawford, chairman of the group\'s advocacy committee. ``The financial well-being of the Rose Bowl facility is important, but so are impacts to the Arroyo as Pasadena\'s largest public park, the status of the National Historic Landmark, the viability of the golf course and livability in surrounding historic neighborhoods.\'\' Speaking Tuesday, Mossman said that all of the design plans she saw would ruin the Rose Bowl\'s historic character. Even an option that would lower the football field 20 or 30 feet leaves ``holes in it and stuff piled on top of it.\'\' ``The end result would still be you would never know the Rose Bowl was there,\'\' said Mossman. When asked if the designs had changed since Pasadena Heritage reviewed them, Darryl Dunn, RBOC general manager, reiterated the plans were ``concepts.\'\' ``The architects are working with our historic preservation consultant,\'\' Historic Resources Group of Los Angeles, Dunn said. ``We\'re not ready yet to show the concepts (to the public) until we answer a few questions internally.\'\' Bill Thomson, RBOC board member and chairman of its tenant search committee, said he understands Pasadena Heritage\'s concerns. ``A lot of consideration\'\' is being given to preserving both the stadium\'s historic character and maintaining its ``beautiful setting\'\' in the Arroyo Seco, he said. ``We may come to a position where we are not able to satisfy totally their concerns, but I am confident they will agree at the end of the day that we ... did as much as we could to preserve as much of the Rose Bowl as\'\' possible, said Thomson. ``Everyone understands the real goal is to preserve the Rose Bowl for generations to come as a viable football and soccer stadium.\'\' Renovating the stadium could cost $400 million or more, Thomson said. Because the city is not planning to invest public funds in the project, there remains an issue of what the NFL will want in return for making such a large investment. It could mean giving up some control over the city-owned stadium, said Mayor Bill Bogaard. The city must keep in mind the needs of major stakeholders, mainly the Tournament of Roses and UCLA, when considering a deal, he said. ``At some point in the foreseeable future, whether 30 days or 90 days, the NFL is expected to deliver back to us some proposal for a lease and corresponding economic terms,\'\' said Bogaard. ``That will be the starting point for some pretty careful analysis.\'\' The RBOC will hold a meeting Thursday at the Rose Bowl to discuss progress on a possible NFL deal. Reports will given on architectural design and preservation efforts, community outreach and a planned environmental impact report. -- Gary Scott can be reached at (626) 578-6300, Ext. 4458, or by e- mail at gary.scott@sgvn.com. |
Url: |